CITY OF
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES OF
Whipple
called the meeting to order at
Present: Councilmembers: Clark, Naeyaert,
Preadmore, Helbig, Johnson, Bruno, Whipple
Also
present: Martin Colburn, City
Administrator
Kathy Revels, Finance Director
Dennis McGinty, City Attorney
Joe Dean, DPW Director
Bill Potter, City Engineer
Deborah Stein, Deputy City Clerk
APPROVAL OF MINUTES -
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING:
The Regular Meeting Minutes
of
APPROVAL OF BILLS
MOTION
by Naeyaert, seconded by Preadmore,
To
approve the payment of bills in the amount of $303,068.83 as submitted.
PEOPLE FROM THE FLOOR
None.
REGULAR BUSINESS
Public Hearing – Street
and Sidewalk Special Assessment District
Whipple opened the public hearing at
Larry Dorow of 522 Okemos stated opposition to the
installation of sidewalks on
Whipple responded that since the mid 1970’s, a city
policy has been in place to pave every street in the city with curb and gutter,
drainage, and storm drainage, and install public sidewalks, where feasible.
Charles Bazzy of
Whipple responded that there had been a concerted
effort on the part of the leadership of the city to make it pedestrian friendly. The tenor for the city was set thirty years
ago to have sidewalks on every street where it was practical, and that the homeowners
would pay for half of the cost because it would benefit the value of the
property. The street is wider than
required by specifications. It is the Council’s
belief that narrowing the street will better serve the city because it would be
easier and less expensive to maintain, and it would put four feet more grass in
front of every house. Johnson added
that a narrower street tends to reduce the traffic speed.
Mayor Pro Tem Helbig left the meeting at
Discussion was held on the cost of the assessments
for the homeowners. Colburn informed the
public that forms to apply for the state and city deferment programs were
provided on the table in the chamber foyer.
narrowed Ardella Bement of widened and the sidewalk would not be too close to
her house she would be in agreement. She
asked if the Oesterle property would have sidewalks installed.
Whipple responded that it must be proven that
special assessment improve the property, and it is not possible to prove that
for a cow pasture.
Nancy Cotter of
Potter responded that the sidewalk installation for
the easement area would be made to withstand the farming traffic. McGinty stated that homeowners have a vested
property right to have a parking space even if it is in the right-of-way.
Bessie Mapleloft Mapletoft of
Letters stating opposition to the project were
received today from Richard and Marilyn Fox, property owners of
Whipple closed the public hearing at
Special Assessment
Resolution No. 3, Project No. 2004-1
Special Assessment Resolution No. 3,
Project No. 2004-1 was introduced by
Discussion
ensued regarding the amount of an assessment being realized in the value of the
home being assessed. McGinty explained
that the assessor certifies that the property values on each home assessed will
increase by the amount of the assessment.
CITY OF
2004 STREET AND
SIDEWALK SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
RESOLUTION NO.
3, PROJECT NO. 2004-1
WHEREAS, the
City Council of the City of Mason, pursuant to the provisions of Section 66 of the Mason Code and the
provisions of the City Charter, did on Monday, the 20th day of October, 2003,
adopt a resolution tentatively approving the construction of certain street and
sidewalk improvements (the AProject@, described below), and the establishment of a special
assessment district therefore for the purpose of defraying all or a portion of
the cost thereof, which Project and special assessment district are more
specifically hereinafter described; and
WHEREAS, this
City Council did meet on Monday, the 15th day of December, 2003, at 7:30 p.m.,
the time, date and place set by the City Council to conduct a public hearing to
hear any objections to the Project and to the special assessment district
therefore; and
WHEREAS,
plans and estimates of cost of said Project are on file with the City Clerk .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
1. The
City Council hereby determines to make the following described street and
sidewalk improvements:
The installation of new curb and gutter, new pavement
and base where needed, storm sewer and appurtenances where necessary, sanitary
sewers and appurtenances, and water main and appurtenances where necessary,
sidewalks and driveway approaches where necessary, and related improvements,
seeding, fertilizing , and mulching in the public right-of-way of the following
properties and along and adjacent to the following streets: V/L Howell (04-101-004), 740 Okemos, 730
Okemos, 712 Okemos, 710 Okemos, 660 Okemos, 654 Okemos, 646 Okemos, 630 Okemos,
V/L Okemos (04-176-009), 610 Okemos, 546 Okemos, 536 Okemos, 526 Okemos, 524
Okemos, 522 Okemos, 525 Okemos, 521 Okemos, V/L Okemos (04-200-002), V/L Okemos
(04-200-003), 750 Okemos, V/L Okemos (04-303-015), 415 Okemos, 411 Okemos, 387
Okemos, 363 Okemos, 361 Okemos, 359 Okemos, 341 Okemos, 339 Okemos, 520 Okemos,
432 Okemos, 309 Okemos, 305 Okemos, 293 Okemos, 161 Okemos, 153 Okemos, 149
Okemos,141 Okemos, 135 Okemos, 125 Okemos, 100 N. Jefferson, 217 Okemos,
142/144 Okemos, 126 Okemos, 108 Okemos;
2. The
City Council hereby approves the plans and estimate of cost for the Project in
the sum of $1,754,020.55 as prepared and presented by the City=s
Engineers, Wolverine Engineers and Surveyors, Inc., Mason, Michigan, and
approves the additional sum of not to exceed $4,000.00 to defray legal and
financing costs. Of the total cost of
the project, City Council determines to assess $118,985.66 of that amount
against benefiting property owners in the City.
3. The
City Council finally determines that the special assessment district for the
Project shall consist of the lots and parcels of land in the area of the City
described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein
by reference, and excluding all streets and other land deemed not benefited.
4. The
City Council hereby directs the City Assessor to make, and report to the City
Council within thirty (30) days from the date of this resolution, a special
assessment roll in which shall be described all of the parcels of land to be
assessed as set forth with the names of the owners thereof, if known, and the
total amount to be assessed against each parcel of land, which amounts shall be
such relative proportion of the whole sum to be levied against all parcels of
land in the special assessment district as, on a frontage basis, the benefit to
such parcel bears to the total benefit of all parcels of land in the special
assessment district, all in accordance with Section 66 of the Mason Code and
the provisions of the City Charter, and subject to review and modification by
the City Council.
5. When
the City Assessor shall have completed the special assessment roll, she shall
affix thereto her certificate stating that said roll was made pursuant to a
resolution of the City Council of the City of Mason, adopted December 15, 2003,
and that in making the special assessment roll she has, according to her best
judgment, conformed in all respects to the directions contained in said
resolution and the statutes of the State of Michigan, and the City Assessor shall
then, within thirty (30) days from the date of this resolution, report the
special assessment roll with her certificate attached thereto to the City
Council.
6.
All resolutions
and parts of resolutions insofar as they conflict with the provisions of this
resolution be, and the same are, hereby rescinded.
Yes: (5) Naeyaert, Preadmore, Johnson, Bruno, Whipple
No: (1)
Absent: (1) Helbig
RESOLUTION APPROVED
Special Assessment
Resolution No. 4, Project No. 2004-1
Special
Assessment Resolution No. 4, Project No. 2004-1 was introduced by
CITY OF
2004 STREET AND
SIDEWALK SPECIAL ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION NO. 4
PROJECT NO.
2004-1
WHEREAS, by resolution adopted Monday, December 15, 2003, the
City Council of the City of Mason determined to acquire and construct, with
respect to the proposed street and sidewalk improvement special assessment
district, the more particularly hereinafter-described street and sidewalk
improvements (the AProject@) and assess a portion of the cost thereof against the
property deemed benefited by the Project, all in accordance with Section 66 of
the Mason Code and the provisions of the City Charter; and
WHEREAS, the City Assessor has prepared and reported to the
City Council an estimate of the amounts to be included in a special assessment roll assessing a portion
of the cost of the Project to the property benefited; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to schedule a public
hearing to review and hear objections to the special assessment roll.
NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
1. The special assessment roll shall be
certified and filed with the office of
the City Clerk pursuant to the resolution adopted by the City Council on
Monday, December 15, 2003 and shall be available for public examination during
regular business hours on regular business days.
3.
The City Council
shall meet at
3. The City Clerk shall cause notice of the
hearing and the filing of the special assessment roll to be given to all
interested property owners as provided by Section 66 of the Mason Code and the
City Charter of the City of
NOTICE OF HEARING
CITY
OF
NOTICE OF PUBLIC
HEARING ON THE
SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE
STREET AND
SIDEWALK SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 2004-1
TO THE RESIDENTS AND PROPERTY
OWNERS OF THE CITY OF
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the City Assessor has reported to the City
Council and filed in the office of the City Clerk for public examination a
special assessment roll prepared by her related to all properties listed above,
and that are within the Street and Sidewalk
Special Assessment District 2004-1, and are benefited by the proposed
street and sidewalk project generally
described as follows:
The installation of new curb and
gutter, new pavement and base where needed, storm sewer and appurtenances where
necessary, sanitary sewers and appurtenances, and water main and appurtenances
where necessary, sidewalks and driveway approaches where necessary, and related
improvements, seeding, fertilizing , and mulching in the public right-of-way of
the following properties and along and adjacent to the following streets: V/L Howell (04-101-004), 740 Okemos, 730
Okemos, 712 Okemos, 710 Okemos, 660 Okemos, 654 Okemos, 646 Okemos, 630 Okemos,
V/L Okemos (04-176-009), 610 Okemos, 546 Okemos, 536 Okemos, 526 Okemos, 524
Okemos, 522 Okemos, 525 Okemos, 521 Okemos, V/L Okemos (04-200-002), V/L Okemos
(04-200-003), 750 Okemos, V/L Okemos (04-303-015), 415 Okemos, 411 Okemos, 387
Okemos, 363 Okemos, 361 Okemos, 359 Okemos, 341 Okemos, 339 Okemos, 520 Okemos,
432 Okemos, 309 Okemos, 305 Okemos, 293 Okemos, 161 Okemos, 153 Okemos, 149
Okemos,141 Okemos, 135 Okemos, 125 Okemos, 100 N. Jefferson, 217 Okemos,
142/144 Okemos, 126 Okemos, 108 Okemos;
The special assessment roll has
been prepared for the purpose of assessing 50% of the costs of the acquisition
and construction of the street and sidewalk project and work incidental thereto
within the special assessment district, as more particularly shown on the plans
of the City=s engineers, which are on file and available for
public examination with the City Clerk at the City Hall, 201 West Ash Street,
Mason, Michigan, within the City. The
total estimated assessment is $118,985.66.
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the City Assessor has further reported that the
assessment against each parcel of land within the special assessment district
is such relative portion of the whole sum levied against all parcels of land in
the special assessment district as the benefit to such parcel bears to the total
benefit to all parcels of land in the district.
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the City Council will meet on Monday, the 2nd
day of February, 2004, at 7:30 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, City Hall,
201 West Ash Street, Mason, Michigan
48854, for the purpose of reviewing the proposed special assessment roll and
hearing any objections thereto. The
special assessment roll may be examined at the office of the City Clerk during
regular business hours of regular business days until the time of the hearing
and may further be examined at the hearing.
Appearance and protest at the
hearing, in person or in writing, are required in order to appeal the action of
the City Council in approving the special assessment roll and/or the amount of
an assessment to the state tax tribunal.
A property owner or party in interest, or his or her agent, may appear
in person at the hearing to protest the special assessment proceedings or may
file his or her appearance and protest by letter and his or her personal
appearance will not be required. The
owner or any person having an interest in the real property who protests in
person or in writing at the hearing may file a written appeal of a special
assessment with the state tax tribunal within 30 days of the date the special
assessment roll is confirmed by the City Council.
Further information regarding the street and sidewalk improvement special
assessment project is available at the City Clerk=s offices, City Hall,
Dated:
Martin
Colburn, City Clerk
1.
All
resolutions and parts of resolutions insofar as they conflict with the
provisions of this resolution be, and the same are, hereby rescinded.
Yes: (6) Clark, Naeyaert, Preadmore, Johnson, Bruno, Whipple
No: (0)
Absent: (1) Helbig
RESOLUTION
APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY
Resolution
No. 2003-66 Mayoral Appointments to City Boards and Commissions
Resolution No. 2003-66 was introduced by
A brief discussion was held regarding the Building
Code
Board of Appeals Appointee’s infrequent attendance as a Planning Commission member. However, he has perfect attendance with the
Building Code Board of Appeals. Penny
Vongdara, a Mason resident for three months, was being recommended to serve on
the Planning Commission. Concern was
raised that long time resident, Shirley Richards, applied to serve on the
Planning Commission. Whipple stated that
he spoke with Ms. Richards and they both agreed that appointing someone young
and new to the community would represent a demographic that is currently not
represented on any board or commission.
CITY OF
CITY
COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2003-66
MAYORAL BOARD
AND COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the Mayor, with
confirmation by the City Council, does hereby make the following appointments,
and that each term begins
Building Code Board of Appeals Christopher Schmidt 2006
Downtown Development Authority William Philip 2007
Jeff
Taylor 2007
Ethics Board Mark
Rigg 2006
Historic District Commission Mark Cummings 2006
Jeff Taylor 2006
Dave Hyndman 2006
Planning Commission Barbara
Tornholm 2006
Jim
Mulvany 2006
Penny
Vongdara 2006
Traffic Commission Leon
Clark 2004
(City Council Liaison)
Phil
Birdsall 2005
(filling an unexpired term)
Larry
Briggs 2005
(filling an unexpired term)
RESOLUTION APPROVED
UNANIMOUSLY
Resolution
No. 2003-67 City Council Appointments to City Boards and Commissions
Resolution No. 2003-67 was introduced by
CITY OF
CITY
COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2003-67
CITY COUNCIL
BOARD AND COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of
Board of Review Sharon
Davis 2006
Cemetery Board Richard
Ferris 2006
Cable Communications Commission Randy Gladstone 2006
Phil
Birdsall 2006
Local Development Finance Authority Robert Harter 2007
Water and Sewer Rate Study Committee Jeff Shattuck 2006
Shirley
Richards 2006
Penny
Vongdora 2006
Zoning Board of Appeals Jon Jenkins 2006
Scott
Shattuck 2006
Shirley Richards 2006
(Alternate)
RESOLUTION APPROVED
UNANIMOUSLY
Resolution
No. 2003-68 City Council Appointment to the Planning Commission
Resolution No. 2003-68 was introduced by
CITY OF
CITY
COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2003-68
MAYOR
PRO TEM APPOINTMENT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
WHEREAS, it
is in the best interests of the City that the efforts of the City Council and
the Planning Commission be coordinated in the conduct of their respective
duties; and
WHEREAS, the
appointment of a member of the City Council to the Planning Commission will
provide the conduit for communication that will enable coordination of said
efforts; and
WHEREAS,
Section 3 of the Municipal Planning Act, 1931 PA 285; MCL 125.33, and Section
50.33 of the Mason City Code authorize the appointment of a member of the City
Council to serve as a member of the Mason Planning Commission for a term
concurrent with the term of the council member; and
WHEREAS,
Public Act 285 requires that the appointment of a City Council member to the
Planning Commission shall be by resolution of the City Council;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council does hereby select the Mayor
Pro Tem as a member of the Planning Commission with identical rights and
responsibilities as assigned to the appointed members of the Planning
Commission; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the term of the Mayor Pro Tem as a member of
the Planning Commission shall be the same as the term served as Mayor Pro Tem.
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the effective date for the term is
RESOLUTION APPROVED
UNANIMOUSLY
Resolution
No. 2003-69 Voluntarily Accepting Properties Petitioned for Annexation
Resolution No. 2003-69
was introduced by Bruno and seconded by
CITY
OF
MASON
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2003-69
VOLUNTARILY
ACCEPTING PROPERTIES PETITIONED
FOR
ANNEXATION
WHEREAS, a petition for annexation of 25 acres
of territory from the Township of Vevay to the City of Mason was submitted by
Coe Emens, II and Jeanne A. Emens to the Michigan State Boundary Commission;
and
WHEREAS, approximately 2 acres of property
owned by John L. Palmer and Susan L. Donald are included in the petition due to
the need to maintain uniform and straight boundaries and to avoid the creation
of an island; and
WHEREAS, it has been requested by the
petitioners that this annexation consisting of approximately 25 total acres be
accepted by the city as a voluntary request for annexation; and
WHEREAS, the city can accommodate the proposed
area=s need for municipal services and has
adequate capacity with its existing water treatment and water transmission
lines, waste water treatment plant and sewer transmission lines, police, fire,
and other city services; and
WHEREAS, this annexation is consistent and in
accordance to the settlement agreement (Case No. 97-85216-CK), between
WHEREAS, this area is included within the City=s Comprehensive Development Plan for
residential development;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution be presented to
the Michigan State Boundary Commission at the public hearing to be held on
RESOLUTION APPROVED
UNANIMOUSLY
Resolution
No. 2003-70 Resolution to Transfer Water & Sewer Restricted Funds
Resolution
No. 2003-70 was introduced by
CITY OF
CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-70
RESOLUTION TO
TRANSFER WATER & SEWER RESTRICTED FUNDS
WHEREAS,
pursuant to Resolution 97-28, adopted by the City Council on June 16, 1997, the
City Council determined to transfer certain funds from the City’s Water and
Sewer Fund - Fund Balance Account to an account entitled “Reserve for Special
Purposes - P.O.T.W. Expansion,” Account Number 592-000-00-389-000 (the “Reserve
Account”); and
WHEREAS,
the Reserve Account was restricted by the City Council through Resolution 97-28
so that funds within the Reserve Account could only be used by the City “for
the future expansion of the Publicly Owned Treatment Works of the City of
Mason”; and
WHEREAS,
the Reserve Account presently has a balance of approximately $4,133,389.84; and
WHEREAS,
in 1997, the City Council anticipated that the funds within the Reserve Account
would be needed in the near future to pay costs related to the expansion of the
City’s Publicly Owned Treatment Works; and
WHEREAS, the anticipated need for expansion of the City’s
Publicly Owned Treatment Works has, to date, not materialized to the extent
that it would require the use of the entire balance contained within the
Reserve Account for that purpose in the near future; and
WHEREAS, the City presently intends to undertake certain
improvements to its Water Supply and Sewage Disposal System, which improvements
could be acquired and constructed using funds on hand with the City, such as
funds in the Reserve Account, rather than issuing bonds of the City to finance
those improvements; and
WHEREAS,
some of the proposed improvements to the City’s Water Supply and Sewage
Disposal System are related to the expansion of the City’s Publicly Owned
Treatment Works; and
WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to transfer $2,000,000
from the Reserve Account to the City’s Water and Sewer Fund - Unrestricted Fund
Balance Account, and to remove from those funds the restriction found in
Resolution 97-28 that they only be used “for the future expansion of the
Publicly Owned Treatment Works of the City of
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
1. The City Council hereby authorizes the
City’s Finance Director/Treasurer, or a designee thereof, to transfer
$2,000,000 from the Reserve Account to the City’s Water and Sewer Fund -
Unrestricted Fund Balance Account.
2. With respect to the $2,000,000
transferred from the Reserve Account pursuant to Section 1, above, the City
Council hereby removes the restriction found in Resolution 97-28 that such
funds only be used “for the future expansion of the Publicly Owned Treatment
Works of the City of
3.
All
resolutions and parts of resolutions insofar as they conflict with the
provisions of this resolution be, and the same are, hereby rescinded.
RESOLUTION APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY
Resolution No. 2003-71 Requirements for Reimbursement
of Water & Sewer Restricted Funds
Resolution No. 2003-71 was introduced by Bruno and seconded by
CITY OF
CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-71
REQUIREMENTS FOR
REIMBURSEMENT
OF WATER &
SEWER RESTRICTED FUNDS
WHEREAS,
pursuant to Resolution No. 2003-70 adopted by the City Council on December 15,
2003, the City Council determined to transfer $2,000,000 from the City’s
account entitled “Reserve for Special Purposes - P.O.T.W. Expansion,” Account
Number 592-000-00-389-000 (the “Reserve Account”) to the City’s Water and Sewer
Fund - Unrestricted Fund Balance Account; and
WHEREAS,
pursuant to that same resolution, the City Council determined to remove the
restriction found in Resolution 97-28 that the $2,000,000 in funds transferred
from the Reserve Account only be used “for the future expansion of the Publicly
Owned Treatment Works of the City of
WHEREAS,
the City Council now desires to provide a mechanism by which the $2,000,000
transferred from the Reserve Account shall be repaid to the Reserve Account.
NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
1. The City Council hereby determines that
the $2,000,000 transferred from the Reserve Account shall be repaid to the
Reserve Account, with interest, by no later than December 31, 2010, using
available operating funds/revenues from the City’s Water Supply and Sewage
Disposal System. Such funds shall be
repaid to the Reserve Account in seven (7) annual installments paid on or
before December 31 of each year, beginning December 2004, with interest on the
unpaid principal balance at the rate of 3.0% per annum, based upon a 360-day
year, 30-day month.
2.
The City’s
Finance Director/Treasurer, or a designee thereof, is hereby authorized to take
all necessary and reasonable actions to implement and fulfill the terms and
requirements of this resolution.
3.
All resolutions
and parts of resolutions insofar as they conflict with the provisions of this
resolution be, and the same are, hereby rescinded.
RESOLUTION APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY
Resolution No. 2003-72 Resolution to Accept the
Recommendation from the Planning Commission Not to Rezone the Property Along the
Curve on South Cedar Street Formerly Part of the Vision Condominiums
Resolution No. 2003-72 was introduced by Bruno and seconded by
Johnson informed the Council that a purchase offer was
contingent upon this rezoning. The
prospective purchaser’s intended use was to install a coin car wash
and oil change place and self serve mini storage on the two-acre site. It was indicated that there was support of
the owners of the adjacent condominium development and none from the residents
of the condominium development. The
current Land Use Map indicates this is a medium density residential area with a
site plan approved for a car wash and oil change at the north end of the Sunoco
property. It was felt that it should
remain residential or that a buffer use would be established between
residential and highway commercial. The
site directly beside this proposed site already has approval for a car wash and
oil change, and is zoned highway commercial.
The Planning Commission discussed that a change in zoning could result
in any use acceptable for highway commercial zoning.
CITY OF
CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION 2003-72
A RESOLUTION
TO ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATION FROM THE
PLANNING
COMMISSION NOT TO REZONE THE
PROPERTY ALONG THE CURVE ON
FORMERLY
PART OF THE VISION VILLAGE CONDOMINIUMS
WHEREAS, a request has been received from Jedi
LLC to rezone a parcel of land on the west side of South Cedar Street along the
curve approximately 400 feet north of Kipp Road, formerly the eastern portion
of Vision Village Condominiums; and
WHEREAS, the parcel consists of 1.95 acres of
land and is currently zoned RS-3 / Single Family Residential; and
WHEREAS, the request is to rezone the property
to C-2 / Highway Commercial; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did notice and
conduct a public hearing on the request at its regular meeting held December 9,
2003, with testimony received and public comment solicited; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted 9 - 0 to
recommend to City Council that the property not be rezoned based on a
review of Section 94-396 and the following Findings of Fact:
$
that
the request is inconsistent with and not supported by the current Future Land
Use Map
$
that
the resulting land use would not be in harmony with the existing residential
character, and that the commercial encroachment would negatively affect the
quality of life in the area
$
that
no errors were found or any changed conditions identified that would warrant
the change in zoning;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mason City Council does
hereby accept the Planning Commission=s recommendation that the property not
be rezoned.
RESOLUTION APPROVED
UNANIMOUSLY
Motion
– Directory of Charges Update
MOTION by Johnson, seconded by Naeyaert,
To approve the proposed changes to the Directory of Charges effective
MOTION APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY
Report
– Local Officer’s Compensation Commission
The Local Officer’s
Compensation Commission did not recommend a change in compensation for the
elected officials at this time.
Discussion
– Proposed Ordinance Code Revisions
Whipple presented six
proposed Mason Code revisions. It was
discussed that an ordinance amendment would be on the next agenda.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
·
Bruno asked if a
letter was sent to the Coventry
·
Whipple informed
the Council that the Ad Hoc Committee that is working on the proposed revisions
for the city administrator’s performance evaluation process would present a new
resolution and process at the next meeting.
NEW BUSINESS
None.
CORRESPONDENCE
In addition to the distributed correspondence, a
letter regarding concerns about the City Hall handicap lift was submitted from
Edith Hildebrandt.
LIAISON REPORTS
$
Johnson informed
the Council that the Planning Commission approved the Final Site Plan for River
Walk Condominiums. A workshop is
scheduled for
$
Whipple informed
the Council that the Downtown Development Authority approved a Façade Grant
request for Dick Breedveld, owner of the building located at
ADMINISTRATOR=S REPORT
Colburn informed the Council
regarding the following items.
·
An open house
will be held to recognize the completion of the first rehabilitation project
for downtown apartments, Monday, December 29 for the apartment located at
·
Efforts are being
made to enlist volunteer groups that will routinely clean up the Riverwalk
Trail as a community service project.
PEOPLE FROM THE FLOOR
None.
ADJOURNMENT
_____________________________ __________________________
Martin A. Colburn, City Clerk Russell W. Whipple, Mayor